Thu, September 13, 2007
Facing the Gauntlet
The 2007 primetime fall season starts next Monday with Fox's K-Ville, at which point this year's Annual TiVo Gauntlet of New Fall Programming kicks into gear, as well. I've reviewed the EW fall guide (published on-time this year) and remarkably none of the time slots or premiere dates have changed since my guides were published weeks ago.
I did learn a lot about the new fall shows though. Like, apparently Reaper and Chuck strike a lot of people as being extremely similar. Not me. Both shows have potential, and must navigate a tricky balance of action and comic tone, but I don't categorize my shows by where the lead character works, so I don't think I'd have put these in the same column if TV writers weren't beating me over the head with it. Also, evidently Back to You is an unstoppable comedy juggernaut which will reinvigorate the studio audience sitcom format by showing us all how to do it right. And Kelsey Grammer is a "sitcom supercomputer that can instantly calculate the funniest possible permutation of any situation." If true, it's a shame he hasn't been doing this on television much.
Having watched a few clips of the show, I remain less convinced than EW that it harkens to "ye olde days of Must See TV" or is likely to remind me of Mary Tyler Moore or Murphy Brown. Instead, I see bland, predictable jokes, too many characters, and a laugh track cranked up to 11 on even the smallest gags. There's certainly formidable talent behind the show, with Grammer, Patricia Heaton, and Fred Willard surrounded by able supporting performers and experienced sitcom writers (Christopher Lloyd of Wings and Frasier co-created the show with Steven Levitan of Just Shoot Me). But we've been burned by a seemingly infallible phalanx of talent before. Have you forgotten Studio 60? I can guarantee you I never will.
We'll have to see, I guess. That sentiment, after all, is what initially birthed the ATGoNFP – the idea that there are surprises lurking out there among the dismal new shows, you just have to give them a chance. Without such faith, I'd never have discovered favorites like Criminal Minds or How I Met Your Mother, nor beloved bygones like Wonderfalls, Threshold, or Joan of Arcadia. Not to mention Veronica Mars, for which you all can go right ahead and keep thanking me.
With that in mind, let's look at the rest of EW's "picks," in order of how much I expect them to suck:
Aliens in America (CW, Mondays)
This is a single-camera comedy about a geeky high school loner who gets paired with a Pakistani exchange student and has to suffer the ignorant reactions of his classmates who assume the new kid to be a jihadist. I'm not one of your oversensitive weepy-eyed liberals, and the last thing I value is political correctness, but I was pretty offended by the clips I watched. I've seen this show on a few "top picks" lists; maybe there's something I'm missing. If that something is "a flawed but noble attempt to skewer our cultural foibles" or "hilarious non-sequitur goofiness like Dad's alpaca farming," I don't expect my rating to go up.
Dirty Sexy Money (ABC, Wednesdays)
I'll admit this is a bit of a wild card. At the time I was handing out my pre-ratings for this season, ABC wasn't offering much in the way of Dirty Sexy Money clips on its site. We barely saw any of Krause, and he has the potential to swing things around quite a bit. (Also, EW champions supporting sexpot Natalie Zea. I suppose anything is possible.) My general sense is that this show has a citified Desperate Housewives vibe, and I grew weary of that about half a dozen episodes into its first season.
Bionic Woman (NBC, Wednesdays)
There are some solid possibilities to this one (despite the mixed signals it sends to the gay community). Michelle Ryan seems delightful, the cyborg element is good for some interesting thrills, and people in general seem to like Katee Sackhoff about as much as I detest her. However, it seems like every time we update one of these campy '70s actioners, we add in all this dreary black-ops intrigue. Maybe that'll add to the allure like the early years of Alias, or maybe it'll wear thin. All I'm saying is, it would've been a lot easier to get behind a Bionic Woman rehash if it seemed more fun.
Reaper (CW, Tuesdays)
This show surprised me. I've learned to expect very little from the fledgling CW network, and the premise seemed pretty uninviting. But the cast and the writing grabbed me, especially Ray Wise as Satan. He's always been a Hey, It's That Guy! contender, usually as a shifty senator or stern CEO – but here he cuts loose with a sinister swagger that made me smile. I do not share the hostility of most critics for Tyler Labine's similarities to Jack Black – be they intentional or otherwise.
EW picks are a tricky thing. In the past, they've picked Invasion and Jericho, two shows I found resoundingly awful and misdirected. However, they also picked Arrested Development and Alias, two shows I hadn't otherwise planned to watch. Let that sink in a minute. I read their page-long write-up on my favorite sitcom in television history, and said "Meh. Not for me, but EW calls it a 'pick,' so we'll see." So you understand why I can't totally shrug off these EW picks.
My own picks are still these:
Life (NBC, Wednesdays)
Damian Lewis and Sarah Shahi are a vision to watch, separately and together. I love this show's approach to the ex-con lifestyle. Lewis is bouncy, wide-eyed, and excited to be back in the open air. (The multi-million-dollar settlement can't have hurt.) He's got a unique approach to solving crime, and he's got a fun banter with his partner (Shahi) – and even more fun banter with his prison buddy-turned-financial advisor (Adam Arkin). I'm in love with the idea of a cop show that is more about the characters than the crimes. But the buzz on this one seems pretty flat; maybe I'm experiencing another Studio 60 blind spot.
Pushing Daisies (ABC, Wednesdays)
I still give this show a tremendous amount of credit, just for being god damn unique. Like Life, EW's take is that this show will polarize people. Maybe I'll love it and you'll hate it. Or perhaps vice versa. But its sweet tone seems to be cut with an appropriate amount of irony, and the performances I've seen are engaging.
Carpoolers (ABC, Tuesdays)
This one is even more of a crapshoot, but I laughed aloud at its brief clip, which is more than I can say for most of this year's comedies. I'm willing to give the show's creator, Bruce McCullough, a fair amount of leeway. He's always charmed me. "Shim! Sham! Sha-kam! Cattle explodes! Cow shrapnel drips off tree..." One of you will know what that means.
Of course, it'll be a week or two before we can see how those shows turn out. For now, we're stuck with an abysmal offering from CW (with its Kristen Bell voiceover, a bittersweet reminder of what might have been); the aforementioned Back to You (with that title's clever double meaning); K-Ville, which is stirring some controversy for depicting cops in post-Katrina New Orleans; and Kid Nation, stirring even more controversy for skirting child labor laws and allowing teenagers to drink bleach.
Also, Kitchen Nightmares from Gordon Ramsay. I generally give myself a pass on reality shows during the ATGoNFP. I put Kid Nation on this year's list because it will be so easy to make fun of, but that's all. Something in the EW write-up for Kitchen Nightmares caught my interest, even though I've purposely avoided Hell's Kitchen. So I may watch an episode, but not in an official Gauntlet capacity.
Premiering Next Week
K-Ville: Fox, Monday at 9:00
Back to You: Fox, Wednesday at 8:00
Kid Nation: CBS, Wednesday at 8:00
Gossip Girl: CW, Wednesday at 9:00
Unofficially:
Kitchen Nightmares: Fox, Wednesday at 9:00
Returning Next Week
Update: I forgot that my ATGoNFP weeks run Monday-Sunday, since new columns are usually posted Mondays. Thus, here are the returning premieres from Sunday 9/23, the night before the next ATGoNFP update goes up.
The Simpsons: Fox, Sunday at 8:00
King of the Hill: Fox, Sunday at 8:30
Family Guy: Fox, Sunday at 9:00 (full hour)
Shark: CBS, Sunday at 10:00
Joe Mulder — Thu, 9/13/07 8:46pm
Well, then you're clearly insane. Jack Klugman and Ray Romano both played sportswriters, and "The Odd Couple" and "Everybody Loves Raymond" were identical. Who doesn't know that? I heard they didn't even write new episodes of "Raymond;" they just shot old "Odd Couple" scripts with Patricia Heaton saying Tony Randall's lines.
You're right, of course; I've read where people are saying Chuck and Reaper seem like they have very similar premises, and, I was like, "What? How?"
I remain similarly unconvinced, and I've only seen maybe 15 total seconds of commercials for the show on Fox. I don't plan to watch this show. I would just love to see a brilliant multi-camera, studio audience sitcom come along and master the format (like Frasier did, Mr. "Kelsey-Grammer-isn't-an-Unstoppable-Comedy-Robot"), just so people could finally shut up about that.
If you're talking about me specifically, you must detest Katee Sackhoff a lot. A whole lot. You must detest downloaded pictures of her like twice a day, when your wife is asleep or at work.
EW is the sole reason I started watching Buffy as early as I did (when Season 1 was just finishing reruns, just before Season 2). I'm pretty sure I would have started watching Buffy eventually, but, certainly not as soon.
And what if I never had? I'm not sure I'm up to the challenge of imagining a universe in which that's even allowed to happen. So, even though I won't watch all of EW's picks, the fact that they pick a show can be the difference (i.e., I had no plans whatsoever to watch Reaper – hadn't heard of it, in fact – but, now I'll check it out).
Life is on Wednesdays, which promise to be pretty light for me this season, and it's also Karen's yoga class night and once Anna goes to bed I've got nothing to do, so, throw in Sarah Shahi and all of a sudden a show I wouldn't have looked twice at might have a chance. I'll maybe watch a couple of episodes, where I wouldn't have before.
One thing I have to add: Darling Ben and Alicia have been pimping It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia (which premiers tonight on FX), and, I watched a couple of Season 2 episodes recently, and... it turns out they were right.
You have to watch a few to sort of "get" what they're doing, but, once you do, it's just delightful. It's like someone asked, "What if the characters from Seinfeld were slightly younger, slightly dumber, slightly less classy, several times more selfish and lived slightly farther to the southwest?"
And even if the show turns out not to be your cup of tea, they deserve so very much credit for their ad campaign leading up to Season 3. They've parodied those Mac/PC ads in a way that manages to make it not seem 18 months too late, and then they have one commercial where it's just all the characters beatboxing to the camera. It's complete nonsense, and I watched it about ten times. It's glorious.
I'll put it this way: remember how great the trailer for Ladykillers, that Coen Bros. movie with Tom Hanks, was (as a sidenote, I also loved the movie itself)?
Well, the ads for Season 3 of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia make the trailer for Ladykillers look like the trailer for getting kicked in the balls by Hitler.
Bee Boy — Thu, 9/13/07 11:10pm
Hey, I appreciated Frasier for at least 80% of its run. (It had a season premiere one of those last few years where it seemed as though the writers had swapped places with the writers of Girlfriends in a stunt only slightly more ill-conceived than the CSI/Two and a Half Men crossover they keep threatening us with. I kind of lost interest after that.) But I attributed most of that show's brilliance to its writing. Grammer was good, but it didn't take an unstoppable comedy robot to make that dialogue funny. Case in point: Peri Gilpin was funny on Frasier.
For that matter, I attended a Frasier rehearsal in its later years, and all the comedy that was being layered into the script at the last minute was springing from the fertile mind of Mr. David Hyde Pierce. If there's an unstoppable comedy robot alive (?) today, based on what I saw that day, he's it. (This clip, however, confirms Mr. Grammer's all-time status as an unstoppable pratfall robot.)
I'd love to see the same awesome laugh track sitcom you'd love, because once someone does it, all the hacky writers who've been gumming the same tired jokes and scenarios will be called on the carpet. ("Comedy can still work on a multi-camera show? Then why have you dipshits been spinning your wheels for half a decade?")
Finally, I had no idea Alicia and Darling Ben were still pimping. I watched an episode (I think season two, but it could've been a season one rerun), and it was awful in every way amateur comedy can be, so I never looked back. (It was someone discovering a relative's old stash of Nazi paraphernalia and then... something.)
And this discussion, about a year ago, convinced me I had made the right call:
I'm surprised by the turnaround. Not because you never change your mind (The Fugitive, Dave), but because of how bad the show was when I watched it. But, I'll say this: you've never steered me wrong. (Dr. Katz, Buffy – even if it didn't "take") I'll give it a chance. If you've got links to these allegedly awesome trailers, let us know – they sound fun.
Joe Mulder — Fri, 9/14/07 12:36am
James Earl Jones's Terrance Mann character from Field of Dreams can respond to this better than I could ever hope to:
"I don't recall saying that. I can't even recall thinking that."
Yeah; maybe I got a little carried away because of the promos (I'll go look for some links and come back), but, the two episodes they showed tonight were good. I don't remember Alicia and Ben saying that is was the best show ever, just, "hey, this show's good. And, seeing as how most shows aren't..." And, on that, I concur.
Be right back...
Joe Mulder — Fri, 9/14/07 12:54am
Ask and ye shall receive. The Mac/PC parodies (the guy saying "I'm Mac" plays Mac on the show, so... there you go):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EbEs7JYPu4
The second one is apparently a parody of some viral video, which makes it about 25% less cool than I thought it was, so... only about 17% cooler than anything else that's ever been on TV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfE558qm96c
Bee Boy — Fri, 9/14/07 7:24am
Welp, if those two episodes are any indication, it looks like we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. The overall stories were pretty funny, and the physical stuff was good. Pretty much any time they weren't talking, I was fine. But do the characters always bark every line like they're reading a comedy sketch at its very first table read? I don't think I'm ever going to "get" that – that fucking grated on me. Strangely, I was fine with moments in Arrested Development when the jokes only worked because we all acknowledged it was a TV show, but somehow having every line sound like "This is a comedy line!" made me mad.
Aside from Kaitlin Olson and Danny DeVito, I hated absolutely everyone in the main cast. Although Charlie Day was sometimes tolerable, and Glenn Howerton had his good moments.
I won't completely trash a show that has a sweet old lady saying, "I did have an abortion; it just didn't take." That's inspired. But I sincerely doubt I'll watch it again. Cute ads, though.
Joe Mulder — Fri, 9/14/07 12:17pm
I'm perfectly willing to agree to disagree on this.
Brandon — Wed, 12/26/07 4:35pm
I'm going to have to agree to agree with Joe on this one, having just binged on six or seven Season 2 episodes myself. I've been completely turned around on the show. And I can't get enough Charlie Day.
Bee Boy — Thu, 12/27/07 11:05am
Whoa.
All future discussions of comedy on onebee will be restricted to 30 Rock and Steve Martin. At least we can all agree they're never disastrously unfunny!