Thu, June 1, 2006
United We Suck
One of the reasons the airline industry is currently experiencing financial difficulties is that it's an absolute nightmare to travel by air. Even a well-prepared, savvy traveler will be confronted with myriad hassles, anxieties, and disappointments in the struggle to simply get from point A to point B. Leaving aside the pitiful farce of the security screening – misguided as it is, it's not the airlines' fault – there are still countless ways to get screwed. Any vacation that includes air travel will start and end with a miserable ordeal which hangs over the beginning of a trip and leaves a sour taste after it's over.
Now more than ever, it's time to heal. So rather than just bitch about my worst-ever day of air travel (Tuesday), I'm here to bitch about it and offer solutions. You're welcome, universe.
Air Traffic Control Delays
The Scenario: I arrive at the car rental place early so I can get on the shuttle early so I can get to the airport early so I can get through security early so I can get to the gate about an hour before the scheduled departure of my flight. Upon arriving there, I'm told the flight will be delayed half an hour. "We know many of you have connections," they say. (Ya think?! On a United flight to O'Hare?) "So we're trying to get that moved up." The official explanation is that things are slow in Chicago, so ATC is holding flights at their departure cities in order to lighten the load. Theoretically this makes sense, but only if you ignore every part of the problem. In practice, it's ludicrous. This means if the traffic should dissipate in Chicago, we're still four hours away because we haven't taken off yet. And it only creates more problems downstream because now they're flooding O'Hare with a planeload of people who need their flights rebooked.
My Solution: For one thing, actually try. When I'm in or around an airport, I see lots of people running and scurrying – how often are those people in an airline uniform? We're all running around like lunatics trying to keep their schedule, forcing ourselves to be absurdly early to avoid missing their deadlines, but when do they ever hurry for us? If time's getting short, clean the planes faster, arm the doors for departure faster, whatever it takes to try to get things back on schedule. As long as airline workers are looking at that "delayed" status as a release valve, there's no incentive to try to get back on track.
Also, I think it'd be a neat idea to get the plane in the air, free up the gate at LAX, and then work out the Chicago problem in the ensuing four hours before we land. If we get there and they find a way to land us only 30 minutes late, they salvage a lot of missed connections.
Telephone Service
The Scenario: By the time I board my plane, the flight has been delayed an hour. (So much for "trying.") We taxi away from the jetway, and then the pilot comes on to tell us we'll be delayed another 25 minutes. Considering my original layover at O'Hare was only 65 minutes, it seems unlikely that I'll make my connecting flight. So I dig out my cell phone and call the number in the back of "Hemispheres" magazine. (I actually start with the automated flight info line to make sure my connecting flight hasn't also been delayed; it hasn't.) I'm greeted by one of those stupidfuckingawful "voice activated" menu systems. Seriously, who likes these? Do companies actually think so little of us that they think we'll be happier if we're provided with the illusion that we're talking to a human? Because if that's the goal, it's either a deeply flawed illusion or a remarkably retarded human.
If you've faced these things, you know exactly what I mean. They take twice as long to use as push-button systems because first the recording has to greet you in a ridiculously folksy manner, and then he has to tell you how to talk to him. ("Hi! I'll get you that flight information you're looking for. You can say, 'Arrival Information' or, 'Departure Information.'") I wonder if the system would even recognize speech if anyone talked normally into it – I'm always hissing angrily through clenched teeth, and I assume those are the voiceprints they engineer it to recognize.
He asked me for my confirmation number, which is a six digit code – in my case, R52RDY. I spoke it slowly and clearly, and he came back with, RF2RGI. He asked me to use common first names, like "R as in Ralph," and say things like, "the number two," so I did. R52RCY – closer, but is there really such a name as "Cavid?" Unfortunately, this was as close as he would get to accurately understanding my confirmation number in – I'm not kidding – six minutes of trying. I think he actually gave me a few seven- or eight-digit codes. Each time he tried, I'd have to say, "No," like I was scolding a puppy, and he'd say, "Gosh, I'm sorry I'm having such a hard time understanding you. Let's try again." Six minutes of this before he gave up and connected me to an operator. Of course it was hard for him to understand! I'm on a flaky cell phone on a plane with the A/C whooshing and people chattering and the pilot and flight attendants squawking on the intercom every 20 seconds. How many calls to United's reservation help line come in this exact situation? Maybe 30%? That's okay, though, because another 50% are from people who are standing in nice, quiet airports.
My Solution: Abolish these useless voice menu systems for good. If your target audience is people who like to talk but can't press buttons on a phone keypad, then you've missed the mark by aiming at people who have just dialed a fucking telephone. The keypad-activated systems allow you to interrupt the message as soon as you know what number to press; most voice-activated systems wait until they've played the menu before they "listen" for your input. And even then, they'll only understand it if you stick to their predetermined phrasing, and you're on a crystal clear connection with no background noise. We've got an input device right there on the keypad, and it's not that much harder to use. Factoring in how often the system misinterprets a response, the keypad system is hundreds of times better.
If you insist on keeping voice-activated menus, at least have the decency to offer a numeric input option. I've used these before ("Say 'Yes' or press 1."), and they're still slower because it takes longer to list all the options, but at least you have a way to make yourself understood. And you don't have to stand there like an idiot while people listen to you scolding a machine.
Connecting Flights
The Scenario: I finally get through to an operator, who agrees that I'll miss my connection. Unfortunately, the next flight to Jacksonville won't leave until the following morning. Tracy politely books me on that flight, and I ask her how I go about obtaining a voucher from United to pay for my hotel room for the night. She says someone at O'Hare will have to help me with that, but the policy is that United does not take responsibility for delays due to weather, because weather is "out of our control." I mention that it's certainly out of my control, and her response is: "It's out of everyone's control." Well, thanks, but I wasn't looking to build a community. I just don't see why I have to be the one who assumes responsibility. After all, I wouldn't even be in Chicago if not for them.
My Solution: How about, contingencies? Checking other carriers or other routes? I know it's a challenge having hundreds of flights operating every day, but obviously this isn't the first time weather has delayed a flight. Don't they plan ahead for this stuff?
But even contingency planning won't eradicate the problem entirely. Things will still go wrong. In that case, all I ask for is a little accountability. "Weather is not under our control."? Sure, fine. But then, what is? Mechanical failure? Pilot error? Accidents are out of everyone's control. But if you're in a business that transports people through the air, you assume the risk of weather. Just as Amtrak assumes the risk of a bridge being out. It's not your fault if it happens, but it's up to you to provide a solution, because your part of the agreement is to get me from City A to City B. I fulfilled my end. I showed up at the specified time and I took my shoes off when I was asked. If I'd had a flat tire or gotten sick and stayed home, I'd not be blaming you for these incidents outside my control. If you can't transport me from City A to City B, on the schedule we agreed upon, the reason is irrelevant. It's up to you to compensate for any additional expenses until the problem is solved. I've already stretched the budget for this trip, a healthy portion of which was the airfare, and I'm expected to shell out for another night's accommodation and two more meals? And, let's leave me out of the equation for a minute (reluctant as my ego is to allow such a thing): I'm actually pretty flexible financially, compared to a lot of travelers. Imagine a family of five taking the same trip. They're barely making ends meet on two salaries, but they've flown out to the coast to see Grandma because she's nearing the end and it does her good to see the kids. They'll be pinching pennies for months to pay for the trip, and now they have to buy dinner and breakfast for the whole brood, plus pay for a hotel room, all because United can't find another plane to send to Jacksonville after 7pm. How is that fair?
Unforeseen problems for a company running a business are just that: problems for the company, not the consumer. If you hire a caterer for your wedding reception and they find weevils in the cake mix, they don't send you to the store to buy more flour. Offering a service means assuming responsibility for the means and materials necessary to bring that service to the customer. Of course United doesn't control the weather, but it's on their end of the balance sheet. Hilton doesn't control the weather either, but if a storm puts a tree branch through the window, they'll move me to another room.
Flight Delays
The Scenario: I arrive in Chicago, ready to do battle over this hotel issue, because it's absolutely ludicrous. However, the departure board tells me my 7pm flight home has been moved to 9:49pm. I walk all the way to gate F12, where I learn that the flight has been moved to gate E2a and will depart at 8:00. I rush over to that gate, and there are no gate agents yet, despite the fact that the departure time is now only 40 minutes away. I cross the hall to the Customer Service desk, because I need to make sure I still even have a seat on this flight. While in line, I navigate the voice menu once again and learn that I am still ticketed for the Tuesday flight, so I can just get on the plane and leave at 8:00. I grab a Coke and a snack, and by the time I'm back at the gate, it's 7:50 and still no attendants. I check a nearby departure board and I learn that the flight is now leaving at 8:30 from gate C7. Strange how there's no notice of this anywhere at gate E2a.
Another long hike brings me to gate C7. The flight is moved to 8:55. I pick up a little pizza for dinner. The flight is moved to 9:00. I go to get a magazine, and return to yet another empty gate. The departure board tells me, at last, that the flight has been canceled. Back to another Customer Service line, while I confirm on the phone that I am still ticketed for the Wednesday morning flight as well. But I'll have to come in early, because I can't print my boarding pass until Wednesday, despite that I'm already in the building. (On the phone, Cindy helpfully points out that I can print my boarding pass if I have access to the Internet. Well, yes, I would have access if you'd gotten me home, but as it is I'm stranded in unconnected limbo.)
It turns out the long line I'm in isn't a general Customer Service line; I was mistaken, and it's actually a line for a canceled flight to Boise. Thankfully, I'm able to get the same information that I would have at the other line: United won't pay for a hotel, but they'll give me a number to call for low rates on last-minute bookings. Not that these rates are particularly low. It boils down to this: if you run a hotel near the airport, a rainy evening is a license to print money. And the local and state governments will be pleased at the extra occupancy tax income. Which answers my earlier question: why the hell would anyone put their airline hub in a city so susceptible to weather?
My Solution: I'm still furious about this hotel thing, but we've covered that. The solution here is: if a flight is canceled, why not handle the displaced passengers from that flight right there at the gate? That's where everyone is. That's where there's an empty desk, and (presumably) a gate agent or two. Sending everyone to one centralized Customer Service line simply adds to the misery. I walked past that line on my way out, and it included at least 80 people. At 10 o'clock at night. (My theory: they do it precisely in order to create a giant line, hoping to deter people from seeking customer service. If the customer gives up, they win.)
Hotel Shuttle
The Scenario: United isn't the only company devoted to making air travel miserable. The O'Hare airport has located its hotel shuttle stand across four lanes of traffic and down an access road. I wish I'd had the presence of mind to photograph the signage that leads the weary traveler to this place, because there's no way for me to describe how confusing it is. An overhead sign indicates that the shuttle stand is through the door below, a sign on the door says I must return to the terminal to find the stand, and a sticker on the floor in the doorway points to the left (or right) for the same thing. I find a friendly O'Hare employee, who gives me detailed directions to the shuttle stand, and after following those directions exactly, I find myself standing in traffic. I see a shuttle for my hotel, which seems to be pulling away from picking people up, so I cross to it and knock on the window. The driver flails his arms and says No. I ask him where I should go, then, and he waves frantically in a nondescript direction. I suppose I have him to thank, though, since I finally locate the shuttle stand.
On a night full of canceled flights like this, it's like a refugee camp. Dozens of people wander aimlessly – all of us crowding around each new arriving bus in hopes of finding salvation. The drivers are like the Lightoller character in Titanic: frantically trying to maintain order among a panicked mob. By the time I get to the shuttle stand, that same driver is just pulling up, and the crowd sets upon him. He starts pushing people back, turning them away, and shouting in broken English something about "Door #2." (It's not a Monty Hall reference; there are three or four doors along the shuttle stop building, and we're at Door #3 because that's where the hotel reservation agent told me to go.) It's impossible to understand what he's saying, between his accent and the loud engines and the aforementioned mob, but he seems to be saying there are multiple Holiday Inn Selects and multiple separate shuttles. I notice that his is plastered with the word "Rosemont," when I've been told to get on a shuttle for "Holiday Inn Select O'Hare." So I back away and leave him to the animals.
I call information and ask for the Holiday Inn Select O'Hare; I am promptly connected to a Radisson somewhere in the city. They're friendly enough to patch me through to 1-800-HOLIDAY (and it is beginning to feel like a bit of a holiday, this voyage – the festive celebration of Homicidal Sociopathic Rage Day). At last I'm connected to the hotel that has my reservation, and my heart sinks as he answers the phone, "Holiday Inn Select Rosemont." I confirm that I should've taken the previous shuttle after all, and I wait for the next one. When it arrives, its driver (who speaks broken English in an entirely new dialect) insists that no one will be allowed to stand during the short trip to the hotel, which means some of us must take the third shuttle. Thankfully, I'm not among them, but by now they are my brothers, and I bleed for their wounds.
My Solution: There are a lot of problems here, but it begins with the fact that everyone knows there will be a huge amount of displaced passengers coming in – they have the reservations, they see the rainstorm – and nobody does anything about it. Speed up the shuttle routes; take on more people; add a driver if you have to. It's crazy to expect people who've spent the last few hours standing in lines and waiting for bad news to stand around in the humid, drizzling rain and wait some more.
Also, I really think the hotels should prioritize friendliness, courtesy, and communication skills in their drivers. If that first guy had spent 20 seconds explaining the situation, I could've found the right place and the right shuttle much faster. If he'd stopped and clearly communicated to people what the mix-up was about Door #2 vs. Door #3, a lot of us would have found our correct shuttle more quickly.
Not to mention the signage. Dear lord, the signage.
Holiday Inn Select
The Scenario: Initially thrilled to be booked onto the top floor, I soon realize the drawback: the storm has saturated the roof, and my ceiling is leaking. (No big deal, I wasn't using my ice bucket anyway.) I jump in the shower to wash away the shame and anguish, and the shower has no water pressure because HI Select has added a "fogless mirror" in the shower as a cute little bullet point to put on their pamphlets for business travelers (leaving out the half of business travelers who don't shave their faces), and the connection where this mirror attaches to the shower head in order to heat its insides and keep it fogless is leaking. So, a mirror I don't want is siphoning off all the water, and I'm forced to shampoo my hair in a trickle.
My Solution: I don't really have a solution to this one. By this point, I thought seriously about killing myself. Not because I had it so bad – in the grand scheme, I didn't – but I was just so exhausted I didn't want to deal with any further disappointment. I fantasized about returning to the airport, stealing a gun off a security guard and shooting people until the authorities came and took me down. It seemed, oddly, easier than getting up the next day at 5:30 and going through it all again.
So, there you have it. You can see how an otherwise delightful trip to LA (friends! weather! Baby Mulder!) was tarnished by one day's horrific roller coaster of disappointment and discomfort. A giant company brings me to nervous breakdown, and the only recourse I really have is to write an angry letter. I'll try it, I guess. Maybe they'll pay for my hotel room; I think they should pay for the flight, too. Instead, I bet they'll pay for nothing. They don't even serve dinner on the planes any more. But they're not ashamed to ask for federal bailouts. Gross mismanagement, after all, is out of their control.
Joe Mulder — Thu, 6/1/06 12:45pm
We're taking United in a couple of weeks, and we have a stop in O'Hare (on the way there at least). Can't wait!
I'm sorry. I can't let you get away with this. You actually think that half of all business travelers are women? (and/or guys with beards?) I mean, I know we all want to live in a politically correct world filled with gumdrops and equality, but, come on. Come on.
That said, I bet more people would want a working shower than a non-fog shower mirror.
Anyway. You've pretty much elucidated everything that's wrong with air travel. And it's basically a monopoly; yes, there are plenty of airlines, but only a few of them go where you want to go (if you're going to Jacksonville or Minneapolis, anyway), and fewer still go at the time you want to. So, while it might seem like you have plenty of choices, you don't. If I want to go direct from L.A. to Minneapolis, it's Sun Country, Northwest or my car. So why would they bother with you? They don't need your money (they need people's money, just not yours, you little insect).
Let's just say that, given the fact that in the course of my wife's and my five-plus year relationship we've taken several flights together and had one (maybe two) flight back to Los Angeles actually be on time, I'm not holding out a lot of hope for our trip back to Minnesota. Four flights, two layovers, and a three-month-old baby. Fun stuff.
"Holly" — Thu, 6/1/06 1:38pm
I had the pleasure (har) of staying at a Holiday Inn recently for my sister's graduation. This was one of a few hotels located in a small university town containing a big university. They are clearly well aware that every May is Jackpot time; they jack up room prices to over $200 per night and require reservations one year in advance, with various down payments and a minimum reservation of 3 nights. So each reservation is at least $600. We had two rooms for our group. $$$$$.
They then proceeded to provide the following delightful service bonuses, since we were all paying so much extra money and were in town for such a special occasion.
They hung some balloons and a "congrats grads!" sign in the lobby.
They didn't offer any complimentary morning breakfast whatsoever, not even the tough, half-frozen, 6-month old mini-bagels I've come to expect from quality Holiday Inns. They did charge $8 for a breakfast that my mother reported was bland, generic, and badly-cooked.
They didn't get around to cleaning one of our rooms even though we were gone from 8 am until 6 pm. The other room, interestingly, they DID clean even though we had accidentally left a "Do Not Disturb" sign on the door. When housekeeping finally arrived at the dirty room about 6:15 pm, the woman barrelled into the room with her key without even a courtesy knock, startling us with her sudden presence, then curtly annouced, "Didn't think anyone was here." There wasn't a good response to that, so we just asked why the room hadn't been done already. This was, apparently, a question of incredible insensitivity and stupidity, because it caused her to look at us like we had just arrived from Mars and derided her parentage. She answered, icily, "This hotel is full. I've had to clean twenty rooms today." Again, we didn't have a good answer to that (other than, "Let's count the various ways that's not our problem" but we are too polite for that, at least in the spur of the moment). She then sighed heavily and asked "Do you want it cleaned now, or what?" I said, "We're leaving for dinner in fifteen minutes – can you do it then?" Another heavy sigh, followed by "I can just leave you fresh towels now or something." We ended up telling her to forget about it and leave. Because after all, it was hardly our role as paying customers (ripped-off graduation-rate paying customers) to tell her to clean our room or anything.
Best part. That night, about a quarter to midnight, we were watching some TV and dozing off after our long day of listening to speeches, hiking across campus, being berated for our foolish demands by hotel employees, etc. The room was dim and quiet except for the soft voices of the TV. Suddenly, there was a sound of a key-card in a lock. I thought, "Wow, these walls are thin. I can hear the neighbors going into their room." A door opened. Very loudly, very close. I looked up.
A couple of people were walking into our room.
We leaped up and made startled, defensive noises. The intruders revealed themselves to be a middle-aged couple with suitcases. The man said, "Oh no." The woman said something retrospectively comical like, "This is disasterous." Then they skittered backwards and left, and we heard their upset, anxious voices as they hurried down the hallway toward the elevators.
So we called the front desk and asked for an explanation. Turns out, the front desk felt quite strongly that we had checked out of our room. The guy there naturally refused to take any responsibility for this whatsoever (and why should he have to? it was the COMPUTER's fault, not his or his company's). We pointed out that, since hotel policy dictates both a 3-night stay for the specific three nights of this graduation weekend and payment well in advance, it was pretty far-fetched that the computer would decide we'd leave after two nights. He said he just didn't know, these computers today.... We asked if he could at least trouble himself to kindly not give out our key to anyone else over the course of the night. He said he would make a note of it.
No one else wandered in for the rest of the night, although the next morning the new shift at the front desk knew nothing of the problem and still believed we'd checked out. They were, however, perfectly happy to refuse to refund the money for the room we were supposedly not using.
Sad that these things lend themselves to such long stories, but I totally related to every word of your account (the plane stuff, too). For hotels, I think I'm going to be happier in the future to pay a little more for places owned by smaller, more accountable companies, not these vast corporations. For airlines, who knows. But the first one that starts implementing the changes you've suggested – even (pathetically) just the clear, sympathetic, respectful communication part – will probably be surprised how fast customer satisfaction improves.
Brandon — Thu, 6/1/06 2:37pm
The O'Hare airport has located its hotel shuttle stand across four lanes of traffic and down an access road. I wish I'd had the presence of mind to photograph the signage that leads the weary traveler to this place, because there's no way for me to describe how confusing it is.
Yep. Been through it myself - and this was back in 1999. Good to know that nothing's been improved in seven freaking years. I suspect the signage was implemented by pirates, and that they simply lay in wait along the path and shanghai (do pirates shanghai?) those who get lost, creating and perpetuating a vast O'Hare-based pirate community.
I hate hate hate air travel, but I can say this - I'm currently a big fan of Southwest. We've been flying them almost exclusively for the past year and a half, and I've had no complaints. Of course, the fact that we've been mostly flying for free thanks to Christi's work-earned frequent flyer credits (and companion passes) certainly makes me more predisposed to be satisfied. But the quality and ease of their Rapid Rewards system is also part of our Southwest fervor, since they make it easier to earn free flights, and - unheard of nowadays as most airlines make you spend 14 million miles, give blood and allow yourself to be branded with their logo on your ass just to get a one-way coach ticket - very easy to redeem them. Christi flies Southwest about 5-6 times a month, on average, and has been quite happy with them - though she's mostly doing the Burbank to Bay Area commuter flights, which are short and pretty much hassle-free.
Bee Boy — Thu, 6/1/06 4:27pm
Yeah, and the key there is non-stop. I forgot to add my main suggestion: federal legislation requiring all carriers to offer at least one non-stop flight per day between any two cities in which they operate.
Now we all know airlines are big companies and big companies have giant legal departments and giant legal departments hate people. So all that would happen is these big airlines would split into smaller sub-airlines which service fewer cities just to skirt around the law.
But still, a man can dream. One flight a day, non-stop from Jacksonville to LA. I'd be happy to reserve 15 months in advance for that if I had to.
I did a Google search (And, really, is there any more reliable source of information? I mean, other than people's Wikipedia entries about themselves?) for "What percentage of business travelers are women?" which yielded the following cherry-picked results. Feel free to do the search yourself and read the articles that support your viewpoint.
Women in Lodging:
Business Air Travel [CNN]:
This is from 2004, and the number is "growing fast," so by now it must be at least 50%. Maybe 80%!
Anyway, if roughly 40% are women, I'm willing to bet that 17% of the remaining men wear beards, or – I forgot to mention this before – don't shave in the shower. Personally, I prefer it (but I bring my own goddamn mirror and I'm not such a pussy about fog), but I know many don't. But, yes, I'm sure 90% of those all-important male business travelers would still vote for "working shower" over "fogless mirror."
(While unrelated, the same search yielded this gem: Number of passengers experiencing air travel stress jumps to 81 percent. That was in March of '02, and you'd better believe that number is "growing fast," too. I'd say it's around 109% now.)
As far as Holiday Inn goes, my experience is that they're best evaluated case-by-case. On the onebee road show, we found Holiday Inn Express to be reliably enjoyable, attractive, and friendly with free high-speed internet. (But no cuddly teddy bear decorations.) HI also held that cute "stolen towel amnesty" promotion a few years back, which was nice.
But yeah, it sounds like you ran across the very worst. Sadly, as in all the cases mentioned here, a little commitment to customer service would've solved the problem. You're right – as soon as someone actually gives that a try, they'll be rolling in money. Which is no big surprise, really. They must know it. Which means lousy customer service must be significantly cheaper, considering the continued investment companies are making in that strategy.
Or maybe it's just a matter of sticking with what you know. GM makes cars; they'd be crazy to try selling jellie bracelets or ringtones. Airlines piss off their customers; trying to please them might require an unsustainable force of change.
Joe Mulder — Thu, 6/1/06 7:44pm
I found one from 2005 that said 43%, so we can clearly and inarguably divine that it's growing at 3% per year. So now it's 46%, which means you weren't far off. As such, I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, and was in no way fair comment, and was motivated purely by malice, and I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you, or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
Bee Boy — Thu, 6/1/06 8:16pm
Just as long as you remember, I'm never wrong.
I was tempted to say "46%" – you know what a stickler I am for accuracy in these situations – but "half" just had such a nice ring to it. I'm actually surprised how close I was. But, consider: just because the ladies have begun to realize that there's nothing wrong with staying home and raising children instead of climbing the corporate ladder as their misguided feminist forebears told them they wanted to, that doesn't mean they've actually started doing it yet. I'm sure we'll see that figure head southward again before long. (Until HI Select tempts them back with some novelty shower accessory. Perhaps a mirror that "really listens," or just a handheld shower with a pulse setting.)
Of course, there's still room for debate over my characteristically glib assumption that 0% of female business travelers shave their faces.
AC — Fri, 6/2/06 5:00am
I just want to add that the whole "remove your shoes" thing is a scam, and I'm so sick of it, I'm getting to the point where I don't care if I have to do the extended screening. The TSA made it very very clear that passengers had the RIGHT not to remove their shoes if they were so inclined. But the agents at the security checkpoints are consistently so adamant about it, you'd think that nobody bothered to tell them.
I feel blackmailed every time I go through security: "You don't HAVE to remove your shoes, but if you don't you will MOST LIKELY have to go through additional screening procedures."
Fuck that. I know my rights! I'm not going to spend ten minutes re-tieing my shoes because I feel threatened. Ugh.
Anyway, small potatoes, but this whole tale of woe stirred me. It gets my goat every fucking time.
"Holly" — Sat, 6/3/06 11:52am
Somehow They knew I was thinking mean thoughts about Them and reading this discussion and thus They are striking back.... I was supposed to fly from Roanoke to Denver today but United just cancelled my long flight with no explanation. At least I found out before I left for the airport (barely); I've just rebooked to fly tomorrow instead. Wish me luck.
Joe Mulder — Tue, 6/6/06 12:58am
I've said it before; the only reason we all have to take off our shoes, all the time, in every airport, is because Richard Reid tried (unsuccessfully, I might add!) to do a shoe bomb on a plane from Europe four years ago.
So now everybody across the country has to remove their shoes. Now, I'm all for conscientious and thorough security procedues at the airport, but, the next guy isn't going to try a shoe bomb. I can almost guarantee that.
Plus, as I've always said: thank God Richard Reid didn't try, like, an ass bomb. Then the airport would really suck.
Bee Boy — Tue, 6/6/06 10:16am
I feel the same way. I mean, obviously terrorists are smart enough to realize when they've "used up" a strategy. ("They're onto us with the shoes; on to the ass bomb!") Evidently Michael Chertoff agrees. ("They're onto us with Manhattan; on to Omaha!")*
But the counterargument to that line of reasoning is always: "Well of course the next guy isn't going to try a shoe bomb. We're screening the hell out of people's shoes – they'd be insane to try." So it's impossible to really make any progress along this line of reasoning.
Of course, as whichever hack comedian said, "When the hell are the terrorists going to do us a favor and try the bra bomb?"
*Can you tell new episodes of The Daily Show have resumed? I heard about something that happened!
Joe Mulder — Tue, 6/6/06 12:45pm
I don't know; I just watched Red Dawn (which was so, so awesome, and by the way, anyone who knows me who knew how awesome this movie was and never told me: right here), and in that movie they talk about how the Soviets took Omaha right the hell out. Evidently it's very strategic. Although nobody ever says why...
Brandon — Tue, 6/6/06 3:11pm
and by the way, anyone who knows me who knew how awesome this movie was and never told me: right here
Yeah, but come on - what about those of us who knew you, knew how awesome it was, but were like "There's no way Joe Mulder has not seen that movie. For him not to have already seen a movie this awesome would cause a gigantic rip in the very fabric of our delicate universe." Honestly, the very possibility that you hadn't seen it never even entered my brain. Maybe we need to give you one of these...
"Christi" — Wed, 6/14/06 2:58am
As Brandon said, I travel, a lot, a lot, lot, lot. I am actually writing this from a hotel right now. And as a person whose job is managing a brand reputation, I would like to jump in here.
I agree with everything Jameson said about O'hare and United. Having had slept at O'hare and the surrounding hotels more than once, I feel the right to strongly agree. I would also like to agree with what Brandon has said about Southwest. I have been flying Southwest almost exclusively for 5 years. Mostly the quick up to Oakland and back flights but also cross country to Baltimore.
have to say they are doing it right. Their planes are all one size and they actually have enough leg room. I don't know if any of you have flown in the back of a Northwest or United plane but the have actually reduced the legroom back there so that they could increase it by 2 inches in the front and change $50 more to sit there.
Also, with the open seating, they can board those planes in under 20 minutes, which means they are almost always in time. I know that having people lined up like cattle in pens in the airport might be annoying, but people do that for other airlines too and it isn't as organized.
But for all of those differences, the real difference between Southwest and every other airline is the people. They actually seem to be happy to be there. Perhaps it is the fact that they share in the profits of this PROFITABLE airline (you thought that was an oxymoron didn't you). Perhaps it is because they hire people who like to help people, whatever the reason, it makes a difference.
Joe, I am starting a letter-writting campaign to get Southwest into Minneapolis or Sioux Falls, care to join me? We must have other options than just Northwest and Sun Country!
"Mike" — Wed, 6/14/06 11:30am
Joe! Sorry about Red Dawn! If I had ever thought about it, I almost certainly would have assumed (making an ass out of you and me) that you'd have seen it.
They go for Omaha because Strategic Air Command is there. It is why that's one of the places President Bush was sent to on 9/11. Big underground center that can do it all.
When I was a reporter, I got to go down a few levels once after a long time of haggling, begging, and covering b.s. pin the ribbon on the retiree ceremonies. It is very impressive and just outside of Omaha.
Joe Mulder — Wed, 6/14/06 12:50pm
Oh, I'm there. I've had pretty much nothing but good experiences with Southwest.
It came out in 1984! I was six! SIX! Nobody ever told me! Screw you guys!
Their town motto should be "Omaha: We've Got a Huge SAC."