Sat, May 10, 2003
Lingo
Chuck Woolery is frickin' wasted
The Game Show Network. It's a genius idea. It's like Nick At Nite for game shows, or ESPN Classic or whatever. They just show reruns of wonderful old game shows like the original Allen Ludden Password, with the creepy voiceover "The password is..." and Match Game with Charles Nelson Reilly. It's perfect entertainment. You can't turn it on and not find something great to watch.
And it's a perfect profit-generator for the network. There's no production cost on the shows. Presumably Ludden's adorable widow Betty White gets a pittance per airing in residuals, but that's hardly expensive. Until someone came along from marketing and said that they were missing a key demographic.
So? Maybe I am the only person 18-49 who can't get enough of the old Dick Clark $25,000 Pyramid but that's okay. Nobody would tell ESPN Classic that they need more sewing shows. You pick your niche and you appeal to it. Who's advertising on GSN anyway? Mostly phone-order inventions and medical insurance for the elderly. Do you really need a younger demographic? They decided that they did. So now they have original programming.
Originally, it was almost all hosted by the despicable Todd Newton, but now they've expanded a little. (Thank heavens.) Not that the quality of the shows is up. Russian Roulette is overproduced and the trivia questions are pathetic, just like The Weakest Link. And Newton's re-make of Press Your Luck is positively embarrassing. Cram, however, has a cute premise and is kind of a guilty pleasure because of how silly it is. They give their contestants a stack of reading material and 24 hours to study it and then quiz them afterwards in funny ways. But the standout is Lingo, which is a re-make of a word quiz type show.
Lingo is by no means great; it certainly doesn't stack up against the classic shows, but it is fun to watch because, like Pyramid (or, as I like to call it, The 'Mid) it's fun to play along at home. The contestants are trying to guess a five-letter word, and they are told when they have a letter right and whether it's in the right position. In this way, it's kind of like a mix between hangman and Mastermind, which is one of my favorite board games. On top of that, they've added a stupid Lingo board, that's kind of like Bingo. And, Chuck Woolery.
Which is where it gets ridiculous. And its absurdity reveals the true purpose of the show, as with any of GSN's original programming – to fill time. For some reason, it seems to be difficult to come up with clues or something because the producers of Lingo clearly want to get in as few puzzles as possible. The exhausting process of drawing Lingo balls after every successful solution eliminates probably three puzzles per show. Plus, if you should actually get a Lingo, you have to wait for a dopey animation of a new lingo board resetting. Then, every time anything at all happens, Woolery has to do a recap. "Recap: it's 25 to 50." (Someone wins 25 points by completing a puzzle.) "Okay, so to recap: it's 25 to 75!" Their scores are right there on their tables! Who's not following this?? Clearly, it's just to waste time.
Add to that the Jeopardy!-style chat session after the first commercial break, but with four people instead of three, and you only have time for about two puzzles per show. For some reason, Woolery spends forever with each contestant rather than quickly chatting a few seconds with each team. And that reason is... to waste time. Lingo is not a show to watch without TiVo. There are minutes and minutes between chances to play. (Of course, with TiVo, it's a five minute show.)
What I also find interesting is how poorly the puzzles are run. As contestants spell out their guesses, someone is typing them into a computer, so they'll show up on the graphic and the computer will tell the contestants which letters are correct and which are in the right place. Great. But does the guy at the computer have to be a narcoleptic, drunk second-grader? The letters are typed in so slowly that, at times, it actually costs a team a puzzle. They're up against a clock, but they can't guess until their last guess pops up on the board. It's really weird to watch.
On top of that, Woolery seems to have no concept of how the show works, despite the fact that it's all he does. He has a little screen in front of him, too. Couldn't that prompt him as far as what to say next? The show operates in a fairly simple pattern: Contestants are given the first letter, and guess words. If they get it right, they draw Lingo balls and start a new puzzle. If not, or if they guess a word that's longer than five letters or doesn't exist, play passes to the other team. Couldn't be simpler. Yet Woolery is constantly lost. It's comical, really, if it weren't so sad. He must be on some sort of pills. He actually eats time off a team's clock by saying. "Here's your first word. I should say, here's the first letter of your first word." This, while they're trying to guess the damn word! And every time they get a puzzle, he's lost. "Okay, on to the other team. No, wait. You have control. Oh, first reach in there and grab some Lingo balls." Get with the picture, Chucko!
Why is it that because Chuck Woolery used to host game shows he now hosts game shows? Where is that rule written? Can't we have some new guy, or better yet some washed-up actor the way they cast center square on Hollywood Squares? I'd much rather see Anthony Edwards or Breckin Meyer up there. Woolery seems to feel like he has to justify his existence so he's blabbering non-stop. There's this uninterrupted stream-of-consciousness commentary on the game, which is probably what trips him up when something actually happens. Say you have the following board:
E v e r y
E n t e r
E A s e l
(Capital letters are in the right place, underlined letters are in the correct word but not in the right place in this guess.)
You only have a few seconds to guess another five-letter word, or play passes to the other team. Also, you're trying to get clues about what other letters might be in the word, even if you don't get them all in the right places. It makes sense to guess something, even if you know it isn't right. But if you guess "Early," Chuck will pitch a fit! "Well, of course that won't be it because you know there's not a Y in there and you also know there's no R, but I suppose if that's what you want to guess, man I don't know – it's your scene." He just goes on and on! There are so many reasons to try a guess you know isn't perfect, but he still has to sit there and rant. I guess it gives us a distraction while the gimp kid with the bad eye is trying to type in the guessed word with the tongue depressor they've lashed to his stump hand. ("Early" would've given you "EArLy" in case you're playing at home.)
So, that's it. The show is insane and Woolery is psychotic and nothing makes any sense. But I have to go now, because I want to go watch last night's Lingo on TiVo.
"Audrey" — Wed, 9/14/05 11:22am
I love the game show Lingo, and look forward to watching it ALL the time. It used to come on every night at 11:00 pm EST and my boyfriend and I would watch it together over the phone. What a great show. Would love to be on it someday.
Anonymous Coward — Sun, 10/2/05 8:21am
who is the girls name that runs the lingo board
Bee Boy — Sun, 10/2/05 10:41am
Looks like it's former Miss USA Shandi Finnessey, although there was a different girl last season so if you're looking at reruns, that's not her. I haven't seen the show in a long time, but I was impressed with Shandi's performance in this summer's "Where's Chuck?" promos on GSN. She seems a lot better than the woman she's replacing, although the thought of such a simple show needing a co-host is still pure lunacy.
More on the show at GSN's web site.
"Invoice Jones" — Thu, 10/13/05 5:27pm
Stacey Hayes looks downright exciting compared to the new Lingo gal, Shandi, who has the personality of cold oatmeal. At least Stacey had some spice to her–no question she got Chuck's engines going. Why did she leave?
Joe Mulder — Fri, 3/3/06 12:55pm
Karen and I finally got around to watching "Lingo," and we can't get enough. The great part is because of all of the time-wasting activity they still do, you can watch two half-hour shows in about 25 minutes if you just want to watch the puzzles.
Karen and I are also convinced that, if we went on the show, we could dominate, mostly because she's really really good at it and the odd word she can't get I usually do.
We've already started working on our strategy (have 4-5 pre-planned words ready to go for each letter; try to always start with a word that has an "s" so you know right away if you're dealing with a plural or not; don't double up on letters [for "B - - - -," don't guess "BOOKS"]; that money's as good as ours.
Bee Boy — Fri, 3/3/06 2:52pm
Yeah, with the co-host added, I'll bet the time-wasting is even greater. I'd be surprised if you couldn't watch 3 episodes in 25 minutes.
Your strategy sounds great to me, but I wouldn't be too afraid to guess BEAKS even if you already knew there was no A. Sometimes it's valuable to see if there are any of the other letters in your word, and it's quicker to use a simple word that might waste one letter than to just burn all your time trying to think up the perfect word. (Which is what Woolery seems to advocate, given his reactions in situations like the "Early" example above.)
I guess my point is, you get five chances to guess a word. You don't have to regard every chance as an attempt to solve the puzzle – as Woolery does – you can use the first couple just to get information.
"Isaac" — Thu, 3/30/06 8:04pm
The show totally rocks, and yet everything in this entry is completely true. In fact, I would add that sometimes Chuck decides he knows what the word is when it is obviously not that word.
For example, today someone guessed Hopes. Later they found out it was HOO_S. A guy guessed Hoops, but then his partner yelled NO and guessed Hoods and spelled it before the guy spelled hoops. It was wrong (the word was hooks), and Chuck told the other team they just got the word for free because the first team told it to them.
Shandi is hotttttt
Anonymous Coward — Tue, 1/27/09 11:54pm
I'm watching an episode of Lingo on GSN tonight and Stacey is all dressed in pink and looks very beautiful hot sexy and feminine in pink
Bee Boy — Wed, 1/28/09 12:24am
Well, you did what I'd have done. Google "Lingo" and take the first available opportunity to tell the world your story!
"Lingo sucks" — Mon, 11/23/09 6:08pm
Stacy Shandi blah blah blah. Let's be honest this show just blows with whoever the hell the cohost is or no cohost at all. Stacy and Shandi both look like ugly crackwhores that were picked up off the streets of Compton.
Anonymous Coward — Thu, 1/14/10 7:25pm
Stacy's voice sounds like a frog. She's ugly as fuck too.
"Shandi sucks ass!!" — Sun, 1/17/10 2:15am
I actually think Stacey is pretty hot. Her voice does sound kinda silly tho I have to admit. Now Shandi she's the one who I think is an ugly slutty bitch. I say get rid of Shandi and bring back Stacey
"I love girls who wear pi" — Mon, 6/14/10 4:00pm
I'm watching an episode of Lingo on GSN tonight and Stacey is all dressed in pink and looks very beautiful hot sexy and feminine in pink
Yeah I've seen that episode of Lingo and yes Stacey definitely looked very pretty in pink. On the Lingo epsidoe I watched today Stacey unfortunately wsn't wearing pink but there was a contestant who was all dressed in pinkand she looked very beautiful in pink. She and her partner kicked the other two'sass which I was sohappy about. Then they won the jackpot in bonus lingo. I was so hapy to see a woman all dressed in pink win the bonus lingo. She definitely deserved it with how beautiful she was in pink. Only if Stacey had been wearing pink in that episode too.
"Stacey pretty in pink" — Wed, 11/3/10 7:45pm
Here's a link to the video where Stacey is all dressed in pink for all you people (then again who wouldn't) think Stacey looks way hot in pink.
http://www.videosurf.com/video/stacey-hayes-is-a-hot-game-show-babe-91478184
"Stacey pretty in pink" — Wed, 11/3/10 11:43pm
Another episode where Stacey dresses all in pink. SHe definitely looks way super hot in pink indeed. On the first video where Stacey is dressed in pink Chuck even comments on how hot Stacey looks in pink.
http://www.videosurf.com/evideo/2_sMJdjltLvdQ
"i love when stacey wears" — Mon, 11/15/10 3:07pm
the episode with stacey dressed in pink is on again and im watching it right now they should so the episodes where stacey is dressed in pink everyday she looks so unbelievably beautiful in pink